Know Where Your Bullet Flies and Why: James Baldwin’s Dialogues on Freedom, Love, and Power

What place do violence and power hold in the fight for liberation? Though this may seem like a hackneyed question, it is relevant because the issue has historically been at the center of leftists sects and remains a cause of tension between them. During the USA’s Civil Rights movement, there was a wide range of theories and proposals on the subject. For example, Malcolm X was a famously staunch advocate for the use of violence on liberation fronts, while Nikki Giovanni never explicitly advocated for violence as a means of liberation but enthusiastically believed in calls to action. And Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was committed to pacifism throughout his life, though in a manner that was much more nuanced than mainstream culture gave or gives him credit for. Though examining those three eminent figures is a productive way of approaching this question, any balanced exploration that seeks to understand the issue’s complexity and nuance should grapple seriously with the life and work of James Baldwin, a luminary whose stance on the issue was fluid. By studying the question through a Baldwinian lens and examining his interplay with Malcolm X, Giovanni, and King, and others, we can see that what may feel like incompatible views on violence and power are actually different methods of approaching a cohesive structure for liberatory strategy. Baldwin may have had disagreements with his more militant fellow revolutionaries over violence and the acquisition of power, and he may have taken issue with the nonviolent resistance within the movement, but in many ways his insights were actually compatible with these contemporaries. Students of Baldwin’s work will be richly rewarded when they find that his theories were and still are as crucial to developing strong, balanced political praxis.

Read the whole examination here.